Month: January 2025

Those who know me are aware that I am a true aviation enthusiast. Airplanes, helicopters, and the movement in the skies have always fascinated me. However, this passion also makes aviation-related accidents and negligence leave a deep mark on my heart. The recent plane-helicopter collision in Washington D.C. is a tragic example of such an incident. Each aviation tragedy is a painful reminder of the complex interplay between technology, human error, and organizational responsibility.

In this case, multiple mistakes made by air traffic controllers have now come to light. Critical warnings were not issued on time, incorrect instructions were given, and some crucial information was missing. These errors, though often attributed to pressure and staffing challenges, have far-reaching consequences. But what were the causes of this crash, and how could it have been prevented?

The Busy Airspace of Washington D.C.

First, we need to understand how complex and busy the airspace around Washington D.C. is. This region includes key landmarks such as the Pentagon, the White House, and the U.S. Capitol. Additionally, Ronald Reagan National Airport, a major civilian airport, operates within this area. Therefore, both military and civilian flights, as well as security and transport helicopters, frequently operate in this airspace.

This area is also subject to strict security protocols due to the high concentration of government and military operations. Airspace congestion, combined with these heightened security measures, requires meticulous planning and coordination from air traffic controllers to prevent conflicts between aircraft. Even minor miscommunications can result in catastrophic outcomes in such a sensitive and heavily trafficked region.

Following the crash, some people questioned, “What was a helicopter doing there in the first place?” However, this airspace is one of the most heavily trafficked zones for helicopters, particularly for security reasons. Helicopters often conduct patrol flights around critical locations such as the Pentagon or respond to essential missions. Additionally, medical and rescue helicopters frequently operate in this area, highlighting the diverse and crucial roles they play in emergency services.

The Pilots and High Altitude Flight

The helicopter involved in the crash was operated by experienced pilots. They were flying in accordance with regulations established by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). According to FAA regulations, helicopters in congested airspace are often required to maintain altitudes of 500 feet above obstacles in urban areas or 1,000 feet above higher structures, depending on the complexity of the airspace. Pilots rely on precise instructions from air traffic control to ensure they remain within these safe operational boundaries.

In this case, the helicopter likely remained at a high altitude to avoid conflicts with other air traffic. However, when controllers fail to provide accurate information regarding nearby aircraft, even experienced pilots can find themselves in hazardous situations. Pilots are trained to prioritize situational awareness, but they are also dependent on real-time data from controllers to make informed decisions.

Errors in Air Traffic Control

A chain of errors by air traffic controllers played a significant role in the occurrence of this tragic crash. First, controllers failed to provide the helicopter with accurate and timely information. A crucial warning such as “Lower your altitude” was reportedly not issued. Additionally, the instruction for the helicopter to follow another aircraft lacked clarity, as the exact position and identity of the other aircraft were not clearly conveyed. These communication breakdowns can create severe coordination issues in airspace, with deadly consequences.

Furthermore, just a day before the crash, another dangerous incident occurred in the same airspace. A passenger plane had to abort its landing due to a helicopter appearing on its flight path. This indicates that coordination issues in the area had been ongoing for some time. Patterns of near-misses and miscommunications often serve as red flags, signaling deeper systemic problems within air traffic control operations.

Staff Shortages in Air Traffic Control

Another critical factor was the shortage of personnel in the air traffic control tower. On the day of the crash, only two controllers were on duty, even though four were required for proper operations. As responsibilities were consolidated, the controllers were forced to handle multiple critical tasks simultaneously. This overload of duties increased the likelihood of errors and made the crash almost inevitable.

Moreover, as of September 2023, the airport reportedly employed only 19 fully certified controllers, far below the target of 30. This staffing shortage led to long working hours for the remaining controllers, further exacerbating stress levels and the risk of mistakes. Fatigue among air traffic controllers can impair their judgment, concentration, and reaction times, creating a dangerous environment for both pilots and passengers. With fewer personnel available, those on duty faced increased workloads, diminished concentration, and a higher probability of errors.

The Importance of Human Life and Safety Measures

This tragedy underscores the importance of never underestimating safety when human lives are at stake. Every aircraft, helicopter, and controller must operate in complete harmony. Even seemingly minor errors can trigger a chain reaction, leading to catastrophic outcomes. Aviation safety protocols are built upon the principle that redundancy and clear communication prevent accidents. However, when systemic issues such as staff shortages and training deficiencies persist, these safeguards are compromised.

The aviation sector has learned from past accidents, tightening safety protocols. However, recurring issues such as staff shortages and inadequate training continue to pose risks. Therefore, both air traffic control systems and human resource policies need urgent reform. Continuous investment in infrastructure, technology, and personnel is essential to ensure the skies remain safe for all.

Behind Every Crash Are Real People

After such accidents, what remains are not only technical reports and statistics but also the shattered lives of families, colleagues, and friends. For every number on a report, there is a story of grief and loss. This is why learning from tragedies is not just a necessity but a moral responsibility. The aviation industry must honor those affected by implementing changes that prevent future incidents.

I have always been passionately devoted to aviation. But this passion also compels me to advocate for flight safety at all costs. I hope that such accidents can be prevented in the future and that the aviation industry becomes safer for all. The sky should not be a place of risk but a domain where safety and coordination are paramount.

Victoria Toumit

The human body is an extraordinary system where countless cells work in perfect harmony and cooperation. Each cell performs its duty flawlessly and does not deviate from its assigned function. For example, a red blood cell responsible for transporting oxygen cannot one day suddenly decide, “I now identify as a white blood cell and will start fighting infections!” In biological systems, every element knows its limits and works within those boundaries in collaboration with others. This clear division of labor is what maintains the organism’s health.

This organization within the body strongly mirrors how societies function. Societies also require clear roles and cooperation to operate healthily. If every individual fulfills their responsibilities, order prevails. However, if role confusion arises and boundaries blur, chaos ensues, just as diseases disrupt the body’s equilibrium.

---

Organs and Nations: The Integrity of Roles

In the body, organs have distinct functions. The heart pumps blood, supplying oxygen to the organs; the liver detoxifies the body; and the brain coordinates the entire system. If any organ neglects its task or tries to take over another’s role, the organism’s health deteriorates.

Similarly, nations in the global system have various economic, cultural, and social roles. If a nation fails to perform its role or cooperate with others, global crises can arise. As in biology, sustainable development in societies depends on each entity fulfilling its role and collaborating with others.

---

Cells and Individuals: The Structures That Uphold the System

Cells are the fundamental building blocks of the body, performing specific functions to ensure the organism’s survival. Muscle cells handle contraction, nerve cells transmit information, and red blood cells carry oxygen. This division of labor keeps the body functioning smoothly. In biological systems, this is so strict that a cell cannot abandon its role to take on another. There is no such thing as a cell declaring, “I don’t want to be a muscle cell anymore; I’d rather be a nerve cell!”

In societies, individuals also have roles and responsibilities. Success and order arise when these roles are well-defined and people carry out their tasks with discipline. Disregarding these roles leads to chaos, much like the development of cancer in the body when cells lose their identity and begin uncontrolled growth.

---

Migration and Cellular Movement

In biological systems, migration occurs under specific conditions to support healing and adaptation. When tissue is injured, immune cells (white blood cells) migrate to the affected area to fight infection and promote recovery. However, if these cells migrate to the wrong place or linger too long, they can cause inflammation or damage elsewhere in the body.

Similarly, in societies, migration plays an important role. People migrate in search of better opportunities or security. When migration is well-organized, it benefits both migrants and the receiving society. However, unplanned and chaotic migration can disrupt existing structures and lead to social conflict. Just as in biology, societies require migration to be managed effectively to maintain balance and stability.

---

Natural Order and Social Structure

Biological order operates within defined rules. Diversity within the body is expressed as functional specialization among different types of cells. However, all cells share the same genetic code and serve the overarching goal of maintaining the organism’s health. In societies, a similar principle applies: order and stability are maintained when people work towards common goals and shared values.

Modern discourse often emphasizes “unlimited diversity,” but biology shows us that sustainability requires clearly defined structures. Chaos arises when boundaries and roles are violated. While different functions are necessary within a society, these functions must operate within an organized framework to preserve stability.

---

Biological Rhythms and Social Policies

Biological rhythms are essential for maintaining health. Processes such as sleep, nutrition, and movement function according to regular cycles. When these rhythms are disrupted, diseases develop. Societies and economies must also function in harmony with natural cycles. However, in the modern world, relentless growth and consumption disrupt societal rhythms, leading to crises.

Policies aligned with natural rhythms foster more resilient and sustainable societies. Economic growth should not prioritize short-term profits but instead focus on long-term social well-being.

---

The Importance of Information Flow and System Coordination

In the body, communication occurs through the nervous system and hormones. If this flow of information is disrupted, organs lose their ability to function. Similarly, in societies, communication is facilitated through media, education, and diplomacy. Misinformation or a breakdown in communication creates instability, akin to how genetic mutations disrupt biological systems.

Transparent and accurate information flow is crucial for maintaining a healthy society. Therefore, societies must build systems rooted in science, education, and reliable communication.

---

Societies Inspired by Biology

Biological systems provide valuable insights into how societies can organize themselves more effectively. The cooperation, division of labor, and crisis management among organs and cells are closely mirrored in societal structures. If policies are informed by these biological principles, societies can become healthier, more resilient, and prosperous.

Nature has already shown us the way. It is up to us to interpret and apply these lessons correctly.

Victoria Toumit

In political discourse, it has become common to see conservative and right-wing leaders labeled as “fascist” or “Nazi” when they emphasize border security, national identity, or migration policies. While such comparisons may serve as a rhetorical tool, they are often misleading and historically inaccurate. The attempt to equate today’s right-wing movements with Nazism is not only a misrepresentation of history but also a manipulation of public perception. When examining Hitler’s ideology, it becomes evident that Nazism was neither traditionally right-wing nor socialist in the classical sense. Instead, it represented a totalitarian “third way” that does not align with modern conservative principles.

The Use of Socialist Terminology in Nazi Ideology

During the late 1920s and early 1930s, Germany experienced a surge in communist and socialist movements due to the economic devastation of the Great Depression. In an effort to appeal to the working class and counteract Marxist influence, Hitler named his party the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei). However, despite adopting socialist rhetoric, Nazi policies diverged significantly from classical socialism. The Nazi regime rejected Marxist class struggle and instead focused on racial superiority and national unity.

While socialist systems traditionally aim to abolish private property and redistribute wealth, the Nazis did not entirely dismantle capitalism. Instead, they forced major German corporations into alignment with the state’s objectives. Companies such as Volkswagen, Krupp, and IG Farben continued operating but were subjected to heavy government oversight. This model represented neither free-market capitalism nor true socialism but rather an authoritarian economic structure where the state dictated business operations.

The Misconception of Nazism as Right-Wing

In modern political understanding, right-wing ideologies are generally associated with individual liberties, free-market capitalism, and traditional values. However, Nazi Germany opposed all of these principles. Hitler’s government eliminated individual freedoms, centralized power, and established a totalitarian state where political dissent was crushed. While today’s conservative movements advocate for minimal government interference in the economy, Nazi policies imposed strict state control over economic activities, compelling private businesses to comply with the regime’s directives.

Though some may argue that Hitler’s emphasis on nationalism places him in the right-wing spectrum, the nature of his nationalism was fundamentally different from that of modern democratic conservatives. Today’s right-wing parties emphasize national sovereignty and controlled immigration policies primarily for economic and security reasons, whereas Nazi nationalism was rooted in racial supremacy, leading to genocide and ethnic cleansing.

It is also important to recognize that historical right-wing ideologies have included both democratic conservatism and authoritarian nationalism. Figures such as Francisco Franco in Spain and Benito Mussolini in Italy implemented nationalist, authoritarian policies while maintaining a degree of state-controlled economics. However, these regimes still differed significantly from today’s democratic right-wing parties, which operate within constitutional frameworks and support pluralism.

Key Differences Between Nazism and Modern Conservative Parties

One of the most striking differences between Nazism and today’s right-wing parties lies in their approach to governance and individual rights. Hitler used democratic elections as a means to gain power in 1933 but quickly dismantled democracy, establishing a one-party totalitarian state. In contrast, modern conservative parties function within democratic systems, respecting the rule of law, free elections, and constitutional rights.

Economic policy further distinguishes Nazi ideology from contemporary conservatism. While the Nazi state allowed private businesses to exist, it heavily regulated them, enforcing policies that prioritized the government’s political objectives over market freedom. Today’s right-wing parties, particularly in Western democracies, advocate for free-market capitalism, entrepreneurship, and reduced government intervention in economic affairs.

Religion also played a different role under the Nazi regime compared to modern conservative movements. While contemporary right-wing parties often support religious freedom and uphold traditional family values, Hitler sought to weaken religious institutions. Churches were placed under state control, and religious leaders who opposed Nazi policies were imprisoned or executed. Although some conservative factions in Germany initially saw Hitler as a bulwark against communism, the Nazi regime ultimately sought to manipulate or suppress religious influence.

The issue of immigration policies is another area where historical distortions are frequently made. Modern right-wing parties advocate for regulated immigration primarily to ensure national security and economic stability. However, some critics equate these policies with Nazi-era racial laws, a comparison that overlooks fundamental differences. There is a clear distinction between implementing border security measures and engaging in ethnic cleansing. While Nazi Germany’s racial policies were based on notions of Aryan supremacy and the systematic extermination of certain groups, today’s conservative policies on immigration focus on legal frameworks, economic considerations, and national security concerns.

The Political Weaponization of History

The frequent attempts to associate modern right-wing leaders with Nazism serve more as a political tool than a historical truth. Such comparisons are often used to discredit conservative ideologies rather than engage in meaningful debate. However, reducing Nazism to a simplistic left-versus-right dichotomy ignores the regime’s fundamentally totalitarian nature. Hitler’s ideology did not fit neatly into traditional political categories; it was an authoritarian system that suppressed individual rights, destroyed political opposition, and centralized power in the hands of the state.

The equation of modern conservatism with Nazism represents one of the most significant historical distortions of our time. While political disagreements are inevitable, historical accuracy should not be sacrificed for rhetorical convenience. Understanding the true nature of past regimes is essential to fostering informed discussions and preventing the misuse of history for ideological purposes.

Victoria Toumit

Human rights are the cornerstone of modern societies’ concepts of justice and equality. However, this noble principle is sometimes exploited and turned into a tool for political or ideological manipulation. One of the most glaring examples of this is the exploitation of human rights by illegal immigrants who destroy their identification documents and claim to be minors, as well as the controversies surrounding LGBTQ+ issues. In the UK, cases of illegal immigrants, clearly in their 30s, sitting in high school classrooms alongside actual children highlight the extent of such manipulation.

Bishop’s Statement and the Use of Fear in Public Discourse

Recently, a clergyman made a striking statement, looking Donald Trump in the eye and claiming that illegal immigrants and LGBTQ+ individuals live in “great fear and anxiety.” On the surface, this may appear to be a message of empathy and concern. However, a closer analysis reveals a different motive: a strategy to amplify societal polarization and cultivate fear as a means to generate public sympathy.

Trump has consistently emphasized that he respects the private lives of LGBTQ+ individuals but seeks to prevent ideological impositions on young minds. Similarly, he has clarified that he is not against immigration but insists it must happen within legal frameworks. Despite this, the clergyman’s words seem designed to frame these policies as threats, stoking an unnecessary sense of fear and presenting Trump’s policies as inherently harmful. Under the guise of human rights advocacy, this approach seems to manipulate public perception for ideological purposes.

Identity Manipulation by Illegal Immigrants and Its Impact on Education

In the UK, a significant number of illegal immigrants claim to be minors to exploit international legal protections. By destroying their identification documents and hiding their true age, they can access a range of legal and social benefits. This practice not only undermines the education system but also poses challenges to social justice.

Being classified as a minor provides individuals with protection from deportation, access to specialized accommodation, and the right to education. Consequently, adults falsely claiming to be 15 years old gain undue advantages, occupying spaces meant for actual children. These individuals share classrooms with real minors, jeopardizing their safety and compromising the quality of education.

The Science of Age Determination: Wrist X-Rays

Age determination is a process that can be reliably conducted using scientific methods. One such method is wrist X-rays, which have been a standard tool for estimating age. The development of wrist bones is directly correlated with a person’s age.

In children, the wrist bones display a gap or “V-shaped” structure that signifies incomplete development. As individuals grow older, these gaps close, and by the age of 18, the bones are fully fused and hardened. This method, which has been in use since the 1930s, has been a reliable standard in many countries for determining the age of immigrants.

Why Wrist X-Rays Are No Longer Used

Today, the application of wrist X-rays has been significantly limited due to concerns surrounding human rights. The reasons for this shift include:

• Human Rights Laws: International treaties, such as the European Convention on Human Rights, consider involuntary medical examinations a violation of personal rights, framing them as potentially traumatic experiences.

• Political Correctness: Questioning the age claims of individuals is often perceived as discriminatory or inhumane, leading governments to avoid such practices to evade criticism from human rights organizations.

• Good Faith in the System: Trusting age declarations is viewed as an act of goodwill. However, this goodwill is frequently exploited.

Consequences of Destroying Identity Documents

The destruction of identity documents by illegal immigrants leads to numerous systemic issues:

• Strain on the Education System: Adults falsely claiming to be minors consume resources meant for actual children, adding unnecessary burdens to the education system.

• Compromised Safety: Sharing classrooms with adults creates potential risks for the physical and psychological well-being of children.

• Erosion of Public Trust: The misuse of the system undermines public confidence not only in immigration policies but also in human rights organizations.

• Undermining Social Justice: False claims divert attention and resources away from genuine victims, such as child refugees and victims of human trafficking.

The Role of Human Rights Laws in Facilitating Manipulation

Human rights were designed to ensure dignity and protection for all individuals. However, systemic loopholes allow for their misuse, especially by those who seek to exploit the law for personal gain.

International laws provide extensive protections for individuals under the age of 18, shielding them from deportation and granting access to special benefits. While these protections are critical for genuine child refugees, they are often exploited by adults who claim to be minors. This manipulation distorts the true purpose of human rights and marginalizes real victims.

The Social and Educational Impact of Manipulation

The presence of adults in high school classrooms does more than disrupt the education system; it also weakens the trust between communities and institutions. Children suffer the psychological and physical consequences of this manipulation, while parents lose faith in the system’s ability to protect their families.

At a broader level, this issue reflects the growing misuse of human rights advocacy. When advocacy fails to prioritize genuine needs and instead serves those who manipulate the system, it exacerbates social tensions and undermines the principles of justice.

Addressing the Issues and Protecting Human Rights

To prevent further exploitation and ensure the integrity of human rights, several measures must be implemented.

First, scientific methods like wrist X-rays should be reintroduced with informed consent. These methods can be applied ethically and transparently to distinguish genuine minors from those making false claims.

Second, human rights organizations must operate with greater transparency. They should openly communicate the cases they advocate for and provide clarity about how their resources are allocated.

Lastly, public awareness and education are essential. Helping communities understand the true purpose of human rights can combat the spread of misinformation and reduce the misuse of legal protections.

Overburdened Legal Systems: The Hidden Cost of Manipulation

The misuse of human rights laws also places immense pressure on legal systems. Courts are inundated with cases involving false age claims and identity manipulations, creating significant delays for genuine victims. For example, child refugees fleeing war or victims of human trafficking often face prolonged waits for justice because the system is clogged with cases that exploit its protections. This backlog undermines the principle of timely and effective justice and erodes trust in the legal process.

The Future of Human Rights

Human rights exist to ensure dignity and justice for all individuals. However, when the system is exploited, its credibility is compromised, and societal polarization increases. Bishop’s statements and the manipulation by illegal immigrants demonstrate the risks of misusing human rights for political or personal gain.

True human rights advocacy must be fair, transparent, and attentive to the needs of both individuals and society as a whole. Closing systemic loopholes and prioritizing genuine victims are essential steps to restoring faith in human rights as a cornerstone of justice. Only by addressing these issues can we preserve the integrity and purpose of human rights in a rapidly changing world.

Victoria Toumit

In times of uncertainty, humanity has always sought solace in the mystical and the metaphysical. From ancient civilizations consulting oracles to the medieval fascination with alchemists and witches, the need to look beyond the veil of reality is a recurring pattern in history. Today, amidst global crises and widespread social, economic, and political turmoil, this pattern has resurfaced. Psychics, tarot readers, astrologers, and mystics are once again sought after—not just for entertainment but as guides to an uncertain future.

This resurgence reflects humanity’s quest for clarity, comfort, and control in unpredictable times.

---

The Role of Mysticism in Times of Crisis

Throughout history, people have turned to mystical practices whenever they found themselves unable to make sense of their surroundings or predict their futures.

During the Dark Ages, plagues, famines, and wars created a life dominated by fear and uncertainty. While the Church banned practices like alchemy and witchcraft, people secretly turned to these forbidden arts to find answers. Even during the Renaissance and the Enlightenment—times of significant scientific discovery—mysticism thrived. Kings consulted astrologers, and alchemists were funded by elites because science alone couldn’t explain the unpredictable turns of human life. Similarly, during the World Wars, mediums and astrologers became immensely popular as families, desperate for news of their loved ones, sought solace in the mystical.

---

Modern Factors Behind the Popularity of Mysticism

The modern world mirrors many of the crises from history, including political instability, environmental threats, and economic uncertainty. These factors leave people feeling powerless, driving them toward mystical practices for reassurance.

• Anxiety and Uncertainty: Global crises create a sense of powerlessness. Mystics and astrologers provide “answers” to the unknown, offering a sense of control.

• Hope and Reassurance: Tarot readings and horoscopes, even when vague, can feel like lifelines during turbulent times.

• Distrust in Institutions: Many no longer trust governments, media, or other institutions to tell the truth, seeking alternative sources of guidance.

• Social Media’s Impact: Platforms like TikTok and Instagram have popularized astrology, tarot, and psychic readings, making these practices more accessible and trendy than ever.

---

How Transparent Leadership Could Address Mysticism’s Appeal

The resurgence of mysticism may not solely stem from belief but necessity. When governments fail to address issues like climate change, economic policies, or international relations openly, they leave a void filled by speculation and fear.

Transparent leadership that builds trust and alleviates anxiety could reduce the reliance on mystical practices, allowing people to feel more secure in reality.

---

An Entertaining Anecdote on Mysticism’s Power

During my time as a magazine editor, I once faced a peculiar challenge. We wanted to include a daily horoscope section but had no astrologer on staff. A young writer took on the task, crafting predictions based on her friends’ zodiac signs. Unfortunately, her ex-boyfriend was a Sagittarius, and his section became a personal vendetta:

“Beware of accidents; you might break a bone!”
“Exercise caution while driving to avoid catastrophe!”
“Food poisoning is a real risk today!”

Unbeknownst to her, the magazine’s general manager was also a Sagittarius. After weeks of doom-filled horoscopes, he stormed into the office, demanding to know who wrote them. Though the situation was resolved, it was a humorous reminder of how even casual mystical predictions can have unexpected consequences.

---

Striking a Balance Between Mysticism and Reality

Whether it’s a horoscope or a psychic reading, people turn to mysticism because it offers something reality often doesn’t: clarity, control, and comfort. Yet, history and humor remind us that trusting the unknown too much can lead to unexpected outcomes. The key may lie in finding a balance—embracing mysticism as a source of comfort or entertainment while staying grounded in reality.

Victoria Toumit

A few days ago, I shared my perspective on maintaining balance and refraining from fully aligning with any specific ideology. I strive to support whoever is doing the best work, regardless of labels. Today, I want to approach this subject through the lens of a journalist. Journalism is not merely a profession; it is a moral endeavor that upholds the public’s right to know the truth.

---

Neutrality and Journalism: A Lost Virtue

When a media organization and its employees abandon neutrality, they lose their purpose. Instead of informing, they become propagandists. Instead of presenting the truth, they impose agendas. A journalist’s job is to provide the public with the facts so they can form their own conclusions. Yet, in today’s world, many media outlets have either been purchased outright or ideologically hijacked.

Can a Journalist Sell Their Pen?

A true journalist would rather break their pen than sell it. However, since the early 2000s, I’ve observed many of my colleagues opting for early retirement. The reason? “Things are no longer the same,” they said. The world was becoming increasingly polarized, and to facilitate this, there was a need for ideologically compliant voices in the media.

A Lesson from History: The Power of Neutral Journalism

Consider the Watergate scandal in the 1970s, one of the golden moments in journalism. Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, two reporters, exposed political corruption involving then-President Richard Nixon. This investigation ultimately led to the first presidential resignation in U.S. history.

• Such examples highlight journalism’s critical role in holding power accountable and protecting democracy.

• Can we see similar courage today? Unfortunately, not as often.

---

Journalism in the Past: The Golden Age of Neutrality

Let me share a memory from a time when journalism was still an honorable profession. In 1994, I was working at a news channel in Turkey. My job was to rewrite and prepare news stories from agencies for the evening broadcast.

One day, a sports anchor threw a news file on the floor, saying:
“No, I won’t read this story just because the minister wants it this way! One day, the political winds will shift, and a new government will come to power. How will I look those I criticized in the eye then? If you want it read this way, you read it yourself. I refuse to praise or criticize anyone. Rewrite the story neutrally, or I won’t read it tonight!”

This bold stance came from an ordinary news anchor—not a high-ranking figure at the channel, not someone who could afford to take career risks lightly. Back then, true democracy and genuine workers’ rights prevailed.

Where Are We Now?

This story points to an era when neutrality in the media was achievable. Today, however, social media algorithms ensure that people only see news reinforcing their beliefs. This shift has eroded critical thinking, replacing it with blind allegiance. The once-liberated press is now trapped in a cycle of clickbait and ideological conformity.

---

A Psychological Perspective: Those Who Constantly Speak of Democracy

Human psychology has an interesting quirk: when someone constantly brings up a subject, it often reveals their insecurities about it. Those who harp on honor and dignity often struggle with these concepts themselves. People who endlessly talk about the evils of alcohol or drugs are often battling addiction or its consequences.

What about today? The word “democracy” is everywhere. “This is a threat to our democracy,” they say. But upon closer inspection, their concept of democracy is merely a tool for perpetuating and advancing their own ideology. We have reached a point where we can no longer speak freely because every word we utter is perceived as a threat to someone’s version of democracy.

---

Grooming Scandals: A Media Failure

Neutral journalism is not just about reporting events; it is about bringing essential issues to light. Yet the grooming scandals in the United Kingdom reveal how the media’s silence can be just as damaging as misinformation.

For years, grooming gangs preyed on thousands of young girls across the country. Despite the scale of the abuse, many media outlets either ignored the stories or downplayed their significance.

Why Did the Media Stay Silent?

• Political Correctness: Media organizations feared that covering these incidents might lead to accusations of racism or Islamophobia.

• Agenda Setting: Instead of focusing on the victims and the systemic failures that allowed such abuse, the media prioritized less controversial narratives.

The Consequences:

This silence did more than undermine journalistic integrity—it betrayed the victims. A media organization’s role is to inform the public and hold those in power accountable. By ignoring these scandals, the media failed in its duty to protect the vulnerable and shine a light on societal injustices.

---

How Many Courageous Journalists Remain Today?

In this oppressive climate, courageous journalists are rare. In a society where speaking out leads to imprisonment or labels like “phobic,” “fascist,” or “Nazi,” what can a journalist write?

• The Erosion of Freedom: People are unable to express their opinions openly. Intellectual debates have been replaced by cancel culture and public shaming.

• The Transformation of the Press: The media, once dedicated to pursuing the truth, has become a propaganda machine serving specific agendas.

What Can Be Done?

• Support Independent Media: Shift reliance away from corporate media to platforms practicing genuine journalism.

• Improve Media Literacy: Verify information and question everything you read or hear.

---

Break Your Pen, But Never Sell It!

Veteran journalists once advised me: “Report the news but don’t become the news. If necessary, break your pen, but never sell it. And above all, remain impartial.” These words have never been more relevant. In an era where the press manipulates rather than informs, neutrality is not a luxury but a necessity.

Democracy is not just about the right to vote; it is about the right to know. When journalists fall silent, the people are silenced. Therefore, no matter how difficult it is, we must never stop speaking the truth or striving for impartiality.

True journalism is not only about seeking the truth but also about having the courage to defend it.

Victoria Toumit

The world is getting smaller, yet humanity seems to be drifting further apart. The globalization brought about by digitalization has not united societies but rather pushed them into a complex psychological labyrinth. Today, we can learn about an event happening on the other side of the world within seconds, yet we often get lost among headlines filled with information—some true, some false. This deluge of information simultaneously weakens individuals’ connection with reality, increases societal polarization, and drives us into a collective hypnosis, a state that can be described as mass psychosis.

Some may attempt to explain the current societal mood by claiming, “it has always been like this.” However, as a journalist who actively worked from the late 1980s to the 2000s, such a pervasive and global state of mind was not present back then. There was violence, hatred, and chaos during those times as well. Yet, I did not observe an epidemic of narcissism, such widespread collective anger, or a tendency toward violence affecting every layer of society as it does today. Nowadays, people carry knives or guns in their pockets and can thoughtlessly harm others over a difference in opinion or taste.

Social media is only part of this phenomenon. On one hand, it leaves us with a constant sense of being watched, while on the other, it traps us in a cycle of dependency on likes and approval. But there is another force shaping our societal psychology: television series, movies, reality shows, and popular culture. These media contents exert such a powerful influence over our lives that individuals often disconnect from reality and strive to live in these artificial worlds.

The Impact of Reality Shows and Popular Culture

Reality shows began to dominate television screens in the 2000s, profoundly affecting societies’ perception of reality. Programs like “Big Brother” normalized the idea of a world where individuals are constantly under surveillance. In these shows, people’s lives were shaped by competition, manipulation, and deception. Audiences not only found these behaviors entertaining but also began incorporating these dynamics into their lives.

Similarly, competitions like “Survivor” emphasized rivalry and individual achievement over solidarity among people. Shows like “America’s Next Top Model” or “Idol” propagated the idea that physical appearance or popularity defined individual worth. This led to the elevation of unrealistic beauty and success standards. In striving to meet these standards, individuals became increasingly detached from their own realities.

Television series and movies similarly shaped societal moods. Shows like “Friends,” for instance, cultivated perceptions of “perfect friendships” or “fun-filled lives.” However, the relationships and lifestyles depicted in these series were often too idealized to be sustained in real life. When individuals compared their own lives to these fictional worlds, they often ended up feeling disappointed.

Another striking example is the popularization of the Joker character from the Batman series. Joker emerged as a figure symbolizing anger, loneliness, and alienation. However, the perception of this character as a “hero” fueled tendencies to reject social norms and adopt anti-social behaviors. Joker’s transformation into a symbol of freedom in popular culture triggered unhealthy role model searches, particularly among young people.

Love, Sexuality, and the Distorting Impact of Popular Culture

Media has reshaped not only perceptions of success and friendship but also understandings of love and sexuality. Love has increasingly been dramatized and reduced to a consumer-driven emotion. The “perfect couples” portrayed on social media created unrealistic expectations among individuals. As people began defining love solely through grand gestures and exaggerated emotions, they found themselves unsatisfied with their own relationships.

A deeper consequence of this shift has been the inability to distinguish sexual fantasies and fetishism from healthy sexuality. Influenced by popular culture, individuals began romanticizing obsessive or harmful relationship dynamics. This led to individual dissatisfaction and greater conflicts within relationships.

The Evolution of Generations and the Psychology of Contemporary Society

To understand mass psychosis, it is essential to examine how generations have evolved. The Silent Generation and Baby Boomers were closely tied to family and societal norms. However, digitalization and popular culture became the most powerful factors shaping individuals’ lives.

Generation X grew up during economic crises but managed to preserve their individual freedoms. Millennials were shaped by globalization and technological revolutions but were marked by a constant state of anxiety and fear of the future. Today, Generation Z and Generation Alpha grow up entirely in a digital world. Social media and popular culture have become the dominant forces in their lives. This has increased narcissistic tendencies while weakening empathy and social bonds among individuals.

Historical Reflections of Mass Psychosis: The Anatomy of Fear and Manipulation

Mass psychosis is not just a problem of modern times; societal hysteria has manifested in various forms throughout history. Humanity has always been prone to losing its connection with reality and succumbing to its fears during crises. These conditions often combined with manipulative leaders, ignorance, or a lack of scientific knowledge, leading to even greater collective chaos.

The witch hunts in Europe between the 15th and 17th centuries are a striking example of mass psychosis. During this time, crises such as plagues, famine, and war drove societies to search for scapegoats. Believing in supernatural powers, people attributed these events to “witches,” who were often innocent individuals. Manipulation of societal fears led to the persecution, torture, and execution of thousands. The dissemination of scientific knowledge and rational thought eventually ended this mass hysteria.

The Reign of Terror during the French Revolution is another manifestation of collective paranoia. Intense anger toward the monarchy and paranoia among revolutionaries caused people to view each other as enemies. What began with ideals of liberty and equality devolved into chaos, with thousands being executed as “counter-revolutionaries.” This chaos ended when authoritarian leaders’ extreme policies were rejected by the public.

In the 20th century, Nazi Germany provided one of the darkest examples of how mass psychosis could be transformed into a wave of collective hatred through propaganda. Economic crises and societal insecurities were masterfully manipulated by Hitler and his regime. The German people were incited against Jews and other minorities through propaganda. This process led to the deaths of millions and immense societal trauma. The end of the war and the collapse of the Nazi regime halted this mass psychosis, though its scars remain indelibly etched in human history.

Mass Psychosis and the Collapse of Families

One of the most devastating impacts of mass psychosis is its effect on families, the foundational structure of society. Family communication has weakened under the influence of technology and societal stress. People turn to screens instead of building connections with their families. This not only increases emotional distance but also exacerbates domestic violence and conflicts.

Parents’ economic worries and psychological burdens are passed on to their children. Growing up in an environment of insecurity and lack of affection negatively impacts children’s psychological development. The weakening of family bonds, the cornerstone of societal peace, amplifies the effects of mass psychosis.

Can Mass Psychosis Be Overcome?

The societal chaos we experience today is the product of a world order shaped not only by individuals but also by media, digitalization, and popular culture. However, overcoming mass psychosis requires conscious action by individuals and societies.

Promoting critical thinking and media literacy in education systems can make individuals more resistant to manipulation. Strengthening families and fostering meaningful relationships in real life are key to breaking this cycle.

History shows us that societal recovery can follow crises. Yet, this recovery can only be achieved through the efforts of conscious individuals and societies.

Victoria Toumit

I am neither right-wing nor left-wing. As humanity progresses through ideas that challenge boundaries, I choose to create my own moral compass, thoughts, and stance. When evaluating a presidential candidate, an idea, or a movement, I do not focus on identities, labels, or the allure of societal trends. Instead, I consider the reality of their promises and their impact on society. This choice means “standing in the middle” in a world where polarization has become the norm. However, it also means living a life open to criticism from both sides. Standing in the middle is a symbol of both compromise and solitude.

The Challenge of Charting One’s Own Path

Today’s political climate divides people into two poles: right and left. Amidst the ideological shouting matches, those seeking true meaning are punished with silence.

As someone who chooses to stand in the middle, I often face a harsh reality: forging your own path means embracing both freedom and challenge. It requires letting go of the comfort of blind beliefs. It means developing your own thoughts while respecting others, even in disagreement. Yet, this stance often opens the door to criticism from both sides, as everyone wants to pull you to their side.

The Possibility and Barriers of Dialogue

When I express a viewpoint, I frequently encounter reactions, particularly from left-leaning circles, such as: “What is the basis of your stance? Why don’t you pick a side?”

But ideas are not a game; they are a practice of existence. Throughout history, societies unable to establish dialogue have fractured, and a lack of communication has fueled the greatest conflicts. However, in today’s climate, identities are questioned instead of ideas. It often feels as though every word is a trap, every dialogue a competition.

I want to engage in dialogue, yet too often, it turns into a monologue. While everyone is eager to make their voice heard, listening to the other side is seen not as a virtue, but as a weakness.

On Animal Videos and Humanity

Sharing animal videos, for me, is not just entertainment but a connection. It reminds me of the bond between humanity and nature. Yet, this sometimes draws belittling reactions like:

“Just stick to sharing animal videos.”

Such responses reflect an approach that values individuals only for their ideas. However, humanity is defined not just by ideological stances but also by compassion and love. Love for animals serves as a reminder that we are not merely speaking beings but also feeling and connecting beings.

The Truth Behind Criticism

Journalism has taught me the complexity and simplicity of human thought. Ideas are the mirror of society. They are valuable not just because they resonate but because they inspire people to question. Being criticized or attacked is not merely a personal matter but a demonstration of societal resistance.

Sometimes, these criticisms stem not from simple discomfort but from deeper fears. When people are forced to question their existing beliefs, they often become aggressive because questioning brings change and uncertainty.

The Power of Calmness: Understanding and Explaining

I choose to remain calm in the face of attacks because I know that the volume of one’s voice does not win an argument; the depth of meaning does. If a wrong leader is elected one day, a better one can be chosen the next. However, if the voice of understanding is drowned out amidst the shouting, society is doomed to polarization.

Humanity Beyond Ideologies

Today, it is not just “those in the middle” who are under attack but also the common ground of humanity, the culture of understanding, and dialogue. Defending an ideology should be more than adopting an identity. Our identities should accompany our thoughts, not define them.

Those in the Middle: The Cement of Society

Choosing to stay in the middle may seem like solitude, but it can actually be the foundation of compromise. Bridges are built between two ends. The great leaps in human history are not the legacy of those who shout but of those who think. Even small gestures like sharing animal videos are a way to remind us of this legacy. Humanity thrives not only on ideas but also on love, compassion, and the bond with nature.

Let us remember: humanity grows as long as it can find unity in diversity. And those in the middle are precisely the ones who remind us of this unity.

Victoria Toumit

Social movements have shaped humanity throughout history. Reflecting the spirit, needs, and criticisms of their times, these waves are the expressions of the human condition. However, by their very nature, every movement has a beginning, a peak, and an inevitable end.

Why do some movements endure for decades while others rise and fall quickly? In a rapidly changing world driven by technology, social media, and modern consumer culture, why do contemporary movements have shorter lifespans? Where does a modern movement like woke culture fit within this cycle?

In this article, we examine the birth, rise, and fall of cultural and social movements throughout history, assess today’s woke culture in this context, and, drawing lessons from the past, explore what movements might shape the future.

---

Cultural Movements Through History: Birth, Peak, and Decline

Cultural and social movements often emerge as reactions to the social, economic, and political conditions of their time. Each movement criticizes the shortcomings or excesses of the preceding era and seeks to establish a new order. For instance, Romanticism emerged in response to the dehumanizing effects of the Industrial Revolution, while punk became a banner of rebellion against systemic oppression in the 1970s.

The lifespans of these movements have varied significantly throughout history:

• Romanticism (1790–1850): A movement that celebrated nature and individual emotions as a counter to the mechanization of the Industrial Revolution. It lasted approximately 60 years.

• Bohemianism (1840–1900): A lifestyle that challenged bourgeois values and celebrated artistic freedom. It lasted ~60 years.

• Dadaism and Surrealism (1916–1940): Short but impactful art movements born from the chaos of World War I. They lasted ~8 and ~20 years, respectively.

• Hippies, Punks, Grunge (1960–1995): Youth-driven rebellions that lasted around 10-15 years each.

• Woke Culture (2010–Present): A movement centered on social justice and equality, emphasizing identity politics. However, it is grappling with its internal contradictions.

---

The Shrinking Lifespan of Movements: Why the Change?

In the past, social movements endured for decades. However, in the modern world, their lifespans are shortening. There are several key reasons for this:

1. Technology and Communication: Movements used to take years to spread. Today, social media allows ideas to reach a global audience instantly.

   • Movements like Romanticism and Bohemianism slowly gained traction through books and art, enabling them to last for decades.

   • Woke culture became a global phenomenon almost overnight via social media, but this rapid spread has also led to quicker saturation.

2. Rapid Saturation and Backlash: Easy access to information accelerates both the support for and criticism of movements. This leads to movements reaching their peak and decline more quickly.

3. Impatience and the Need for Constant Change: Modern consumer culture fosters a craving for novelty. Movements are adopted quickly, consumed intensely, and discarded just as fast.

---

The Contradictions Within Woke Culture

Woke culture began as a movement rooted in social justice and equality. However, it also contains inherent contradictions:

1. Identity Politics Conflicts: Supporting LGBTQ+ rights while also advocating for traditional Muslim communities creates tensions between often contradictory values.

2. Free Speech vs. Cancel Culture: Woke culture’s commitment to free speech is at odds with its embrace of cancel culture, where dissenting voices are silenced.

3. Hierarchy of Victimhood: Efforts to address various injustices simultaneously have led to a “competition of grievances,” weakening solidarity among groups.

---

The Future of Woke Culture: What Comes Next?

Considering historical cycles, woke culture is unlikely to be eternal:

• Start: ~2010

• Predicted End: ~2030

• Current State: Approximately 50% of its lifecycle is complete.

What might follow? Based on historical trends, here are some possibilities:

1. A Renaissance of Individualism: A shift from collective identity politics to personal freedom and self-discovery.

2. Rediscovery of Spirituality: Renewed emphasis on spirituality and a connection with nature.

3. Tech-Resistant Minimalism: A rejection of digital excess in favor of simplicity and offline living.

4. Global Solidarity Movements: A move away from identity-based activism to focus on universal issues like climate change and economic inequality.

---

Lessons from History: Movements Shape, but Do Not Last

Every social movement is born out of its time’s needs, but no movement lasts forever. Woke culture, like its predecessors, rose to address specific demands but risks fading unless it resolves its internal contradictions.

History shows that humanity is in constant reinvention. Each movement carries the seeds of the next, shaped by the successes and failures of its predecessors. As woke culture approaches its predicted peak, the world prepares for a new era.

What remains constant is humanity’s drive for progress, meaning, and balance. Movements come and go, but the ultimate goal persists: to create a more just, harmonious, and meaningful world.

Victoria Toumit

Throughout human history, one of the most effective methods of controlling people has been the strategy of “divide and conquer.” This approach continues to shape social and political life today, not only in the depths of history but also in modern democracies. Dividing people to maintain control has been a timeless tool of power, used to strengthen authority by fostering divisions within society. However, in today’s world, this strategy operates in more sophisticated ways through state actions, media influence, social media dynamics, and identity politics.

Unfortunately, this article is being written at a time when humanity is hurtling toward a great collapse. As societies become exhausted by internal conflicts, leaders further polarize populations to consolidate their power, and technology accelerates division, this writing might serve as one of the last warnings.

---

Settling for the Lesser Evil: The Greatest Dilemma of Modern Democracies

In modern democracies, one manifestation of the “divide and conquer” strategy is the presentation of “lesser evil” candidates to the public. In many countries today, people are forced to vote not for leaders they wholeheartedly support but for those they perceive as “less bad” than the alternative. This reality transforms democracy from a mechanism reflecting the will of the people into a system of “forced choices.”

This dilemma further fuels division within society. Representative democracies struggle to produce leaders who can meet the needs and desires of broad swaths of the population. Especially in two-party systems like that of the United States, voters are often trapped between only two options. The internal dynamics of political parties tend to favor candidates who serve the interests of elite factions rather than the general public. As a result, out-of-touch career politicians frequently take center stage.

This process deepens societal division. Leaders who cannot unify their base often resort to polarizing rhetoric. When people cast their votes reluctantly, they lose faith in the system’s effectiveness, leading to collective disillusionment. The perception of “the other side being worse” drives individuals to cling blindly to their own factions while demonizing the opposition.

Ultimately, the lack of transparency, scandals, and the disconnection of politicians from public demands become some of the greatest challenges facing modern democracies. The inability of Irish voters to find a suitable leader during elections and the polarization surrounding figures like Trump and Biden in the U.S. are concrete examples of this phenomenon.

---

How Close Are We to Collapse? Are We at a Tipping Point?

Civilizations have repeatedly found themselves teetering on the edge of a cliff throughout history—and sometimes, they have fallen. Today, we are at a critical juncture. Identity-driven politics, the divisive impact of technology, and the polarizing rhetoric of leaders suggest that societies are nearing a breaking point.

History shows that such periods are often followed by either major collapses or radical transformations. The fall of the Roman Empire, the chaos following the French Revolution, or the ideological rifts of the Cold War all demonstrate how humanity has struggled to balance on the edge of the abyss. Today, however, we face an era where social conflicts are amplified and accelerated by the digital world.

If division continues at its current pace, the structural disintegration of societies and states will become inevitable. But this article aims to remind us that such a collapse is not destiny, and humanity still stands at a crossroads.

---

Modern Manifestations of Division

The “divide and conquer” strategy continues to infiltrate our lives through various modern tools. Identity politics, media manipulation, and social media algorithms have made this strategy more complex and effective. People are no longer divided solely along ethnic or religious lines but also by gender, ideology, and lifestyle.

Identity politics plays a significant role in deepening these divisions. Movements like “woke culture,” which aim to address social justice issues, often hinder dialogue through hypersensitivity and cancel culture. These restrictions on free expression push both sides into defensive positions. One side feels it is fighting for its rights, while the other feels its freedoms are being curtailed. In this climate of conflict, common values are forgotten, and polarization intensifies.

Immigration issues also exemplify this division. In the West, some immigrant groups demanding systems like Sharia law clash with local populations that value freedom and secularism. This creates friction that is often manipulated by media and politicians to further exacerbate divisions, splitting societies into “us” and “them.”

---

A Lesson from History: Division and Control in Nazi Germany

Nazi Germany serves as one of the most chilling examples of the “divide and conquer” strategy. Adolf Hitler unified the German people against a common enemy—the Jews—while simultaneously fostering internal divisions. Through propaganda, the Nazi regime manipulated emotions, ensuring the population remained focused on the perceived threats posed by minorities rather than addressing their own societal challenges.

Fear also played a key role in this strategy. Institutions like the SS and Gestapo enforced a climate of terror, silencing dissent and compelling compliance. While some citizens actively supported the regime, many others remained silent out of fear.

When the war ended, many Nazi supporters retreated into silence, denying or minimizing their complicity. Claims like “We didn’t know” or “Everyone was doing it” allowed individuals to evade responsibility for their roles in the regime. This silence illustrates how easily individuals can deny their societal responsibilities and attempt to escape the shadows of history.

---

Is There Still Time for Unity?

In a world so deeply divided, is there still hope for resolution? The answer is yes, but it requires collective effort, patience, and a shared commitment to rediscovering common values.

Education is the most vital tool in this process. Teaching people to think critically, understand media manipulation, and engage in constructive dialogue can reduce polarization. Additionally, leaders must move away from divisive rhetoric and focus on addressing the needs of all citizens to rebuild trust in the system.

---

Conclusion: Unity Is Humanity’s Only Option

The “divide and conquer” strategy has been one of the most effective yet destructive tools in human history. While it consolidates power for those in control, it ultimately weakens societies in the long run. From Nazi Germany to modern democracies, the consequences of this strategy are evident.

Humanity must break free from this vicious cycle of division. By remembering shared values, fostering dialogue, and embracing critical thinking, we can build a future where unity triumphs over division. Because division only breeds hostility, while unity builds the future.

Victoria Toumit